45 lines
2.6 KiB
Python
45 lines
2.6 KiB
Python
|
||
|
||
stringo = """
|
||
Accordingly, for Sellars, the fundamental import of the manifest
|
||
image is not so much ontological as normative, in the sense that it
|
||
provides the framework ‘in which we think of one another as sharing
|
||
the community intentions which provides the ambience of principles
|
||
and standards (above all those which make meaningful discourse and
|
||
rationality itself possible) within which we live our own individual
|
||
lives’(Sellars 1963a: 40). Thus, the manifest image does not so much
|
||
catalogue a set of indispensable ontological items which we should
|
||
strive to preserve from scientific reduction; rather, it indexes the com-
|
||
munity of rational agents. In this regard, the primary component of the
|
||
manifest image, Sellars suggests, is the notion of persons as loci of
|
||
intentional agency. Consequently, although the manifest image is a
|
||
‘disciplined and critical’ theoretical framework, one which could also be
|
||
said to constitute a certain kind of ‘scientific image’ – albeit one that is
|
||
‘correlational’ as opposed to ‘postulational’ (Sellars 1963a: 7) – it is not
|
||
one which we are in a position simply to take or leave. For unlike
|
||
other theoretical frameworks, Sellars maintains, the manifest image
|
||
provides the ineluctable prerequisite for our capacity to identify our-
|
||
selves as human, which is to say, as persons: ‘[M]an is that being which
|
||
conceives of itself in terms of the manifest image. To the extent that
|
||
the manifest image does not survive […] to that extent man himself
|
||
would not survive’ (Sellars 1963a: 18). What is indispensable about our
|
||
manifest self-image, Sellars concludes, is not its ontological commit-
|
||
ments, in the sense of what it says exists in the world, but rather its
|
||
normative valence as the framework which allows us to make sense of
|
||
ourselves as rational agents engaged in pursuing various purposes in
|
||
the world. Without it, we would simply not know what to do or how to
|
||
make sense of ourselves – indeed, we would no longer be able to recog-
|
||
nize ourselves as human. Accordingly, Sellars, echoing Kant, concludes
|
||
that we have no option but to insist that the manifest image enjoys a
|
||
practical, if not theoretical, priority over the scientific image, since it
|
||
provides the source for the norm of rational purposiveness, which we
|
||
cannot do without. In this regard, the genuine philosophical task,
|
||
according to Sellars, would consist in achieving a properly stereoscopic
|
||
integration of the manifest and scientific images, such that the language
|
||
of rational intention would come to enrich scientific theory so as to
|
||
allow the latter to be directly wedded to human purposes.
|
||
"""
|
||
|
||
print(
|
||
stringo.replace('\n', ' ')
|
||
) |